Destiny and Geography don't Effect Eachother

Geography doesn’t have to do with destiny, because of movement, and Interactions of Humans with the Environment.

With the outbreak in poorer countries some people think that destiny does have to do with geography. One reason why is that people are doing things to contain it (movement). For example, Exxonmobil recently donated $150,000 to the Liberian government. During the early stages of the outbreak they donated $75,000. That is a total of $250,000 donated towards the cause of containing ebola. Another reason why geography doesn’t have to do with destiny is that there are doctors trying to make a vaccine for Ebola. They tested the vaccine on monkeys. They also gave the vaccine to seven patients and 5 of them were released from the hospital, and the other 2 patients passed away. This shows that other countries are helping the regions in need that it is not destiny of where you live.

Also, the people in West Africa can change for the environment. They can build more hospitals, also if a person is sick they can do things for themselves, and try to not spread the virus. For example, in one of the articles it said that U.S had to lead the way, because the African Countries were unable to take care of themselves, because they had lack of health care. Also no matter where you live you can help out and stop the outbreak. You can donate money, and food. In one of the articles it said that they way to cure this is that they get food, and health care. It also says that the U.S. cannot be the only nation helping out to contain it, and that every other country can have a part in doing so. This is why destiny doesn’t have to do with

geography.